The book faced criticism over its language and reception
On The Run Photo/Shutterstock
James LaRue, the director of American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, thinks that the controversy surrounding the Harper Lee classic has to do with its strong language, content that portrays “sexuality and rape,” and “the use of the n-word” (via History). In what he thinks is a flimsy further argument, the book has also come under fire by The Biloxi School Board for simply making people uneasy. LaRue, speaking to History, said, “The whole point to classics is they challenge the way we think about things.”
The most recent episode of banning happened in the Burbank California Unified School District, when the book was pulled from the schools’ programs because parents complained about its racist language, according to Marshall University. In a 2017 incident, the book — whose audio version was narrated by Reese Witherspoon – came under fire by a mother who was worried the use of the n-word would adversely impact her daughter. This happened in Biloxi, Mississippi; the book was banned from the 8th-grade syllabus but was later added back into the program, with the condition that it could be read under parental supervision, per Banned Books.
Author Harper Lee herself challenged this ban
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
In 1966, author of “To Kill a Mockingbird” Harper Lee herself (who’s known for having led a reclusive life, per The Straits Times), challenged a Hanover County, Virginia school’s decision to remove her book from their curriculum because it was “immoral,” per History.
She wrote a bold and witty letter to Richmond News Leader, in which she claimed that the only explanation she could think of for such a claim on her book was that the board members at the Hanover County School couldn’t read. “To hear that the novel is ‘immoral’ has made me count the years between now and 1984, for I have yet to come across a better example of doublethink,” wrote Lee. She even ended the note with a donation so the members of the board could register for first grade reading lessons. The school eventually reversed its decision.
The Real Reason To Kill A Mockingbird Became A Banned Book
Mubasil Z A/Shutterstock
By Jennifer Anandanayagam/Oct. 8, 2022 10:00 am EST
“Shoot all the bluejays you want, if you can hit ’em, but remember it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird,” Atticus Finch tells his daughter Jean Louise “Scout” Finch in the book “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee. This is probably one of the most important lessons little Scout learns — never take advantage of someone weaker than you.
The Pulitzer Prize-winning book is much-loved for many reasons, primary of which is the story-telling that follows the innocent child-like worldview of the almost 6-year-old Scout. She goes through life in sleepy Maycomb, Alabama learning valuable lessons from her wise lawyer-father Atticus and her own experiences (via SparkNotes).
The book faced criticism over its language and reception
On The Run Photo/Shutterstock
James LaRue, the director of American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, thinks that the controversy surrounding the Harper Lee classic has to do with its strong language, content that portrays “sexuality and rape,” and “the use of the n-word” (via History). In what he thinks is a flimsy further argument, the book has also come under fire by The Biloxi School Board for simply making people uneasy. LaRue, speaking to History, said, “The whole point to classics is they challenge the way we think about things.”
The most recent episode of banning happened in the Burbank California Unified School District, when the book was pulled from the schools’ programs because parents complained about its racist language, according to Marshall University. In a 2017 incident, the book — whose audio version was narrated by Reese Witherspoon – came under fire by a mother who was worried the use of the n-word would adversely impact her daughter. This happened in Biloxi, Mississippi; the book was banned from the 8th-grade syllabus but was later added back into the program, with the condition that it could be read under parental supervision, per Banned Books.
The most recent episode of banning happened in the Burbank California Unified School District, when the book was pulled from the schools’ programs because parents complained about its racist language, according to Marshall University.
In a 2017 incident, the book — whose audio version was narrated by Reese Witherspoon – came under fire by a mother who was worried the use of the n-word would adversely impact her daughter. This happened in Biloxi, Mississippi; the book was banned from the 8th-grade syllabus but was later added back into the program, with the condition that it could be read under parental supervision, per Banned Books.
Author Harper Lee herself challenged this ban
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
In 1966, author of “To Kill a Mockingbird” Harper Lee herself (who’s known for having led a reclusive life, per The Straits Times), challenged a Hanover County, Virginia school’s decision to remove her book from their curriculum because it was “immoral,” per History.
She wrote a bold and witty letter to Richmond News Leader, in which she claimed that the only explanation she could think of for such a claim on her book was that the board members at the Hanover County School couldn’t read. “To hear that the novel is ‘immoral’ has made me count the years between now and 1984, for I have yet to come across a better example of doublethink,” wrote Lee. She even ended the note with a donation so the members of the board could register for first grade reading lessons. The school eventually reversed its decision.
She wrote a bold and witty letter to Richmond News Leader, in which she claimed that the only explanation she could think of for such a claim on her book was that the board members at the Hanover County School couldn’t read. “To hear that the novel is ‘immoral’ has made me count the years between now and 1984, for I have yet to come across a better example of doublethink,” wrote Lee. She even ended the note with a donation so the members of the board could register for first grade reading lessons.
The school eventually reversed its decision.
